On Agreement
October 16, 2011 3 Comments
I was asked whether I agree with the Occupy Wall Street people.
Who knows?
Wouldn’t they have to be saying something coherent in order to agree (or, for that matter, disagree) with them?
I still don’t know what their point is, other than the implicit point that they have leisure time.
You shall know them by their fruits.
With all due respect, I think you have to be trying awfully hard to ignore them to be able to truthfully claim you don’t know what they stand for.
I know what sort of people tend to coalesce around such a thing. And, I think I know what they believe and stand for.
However, in my view they are going to actually have to come out and say it before the merit the courtesy of a response. What they are doing now is playing a cowardly double-game of bait-n-switch, with their arrogant claims of being the
Bolsheviks“the 99%”.(Bolshevik connoted ‘majority’ too…)
You wrote: they are going to actually have to come out and say it before the merit the courtesy of a response
I respond: Ah, very good point.
I stand corrected (by you, if that is not obvious enough).!!!