Why Obama’s boring political appointments are so scary
January 6, 2013, 6:08 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

One striking aspect of President Obama’s governance style that I think is going unreported is the, for lack of a better term, establishment-friendly nature of his personnel appointments. We’re being told now that Chuck Hagel is going to be appointed to SecDef. John Kerry for Sec. of State. His VP choice was Joe Biden.

Who are all these guys? Frankly I can’t tell them apart because all I really know about them is that they’re all old white graying-haired Senator types. They are the types of guys whose names you catch randomly over and over from having This Week with David Brinkley on in the background as you play Pharaoh on your computer on a lazy Sunday afternoon when you should be finishing your thesis. Or whatever (you know what I mean).

In other words, they are the ultimate in Generically Boring Politician Guys In Suits. They have name recognition for being multi-term politicians and they won multiple terms due to name recognition. They stuck around and didn’t go away and did absolutely nothing of note in all their time as Generically Boring Politician Guys In Suits.

And Obama has spent his entire Presidency, and even before (i.e. the Biden choice), lavishing oodles and oodles of love upon them. Those are exactly the types of guys Obama seems to want in his Cabinet.

Which is weird. Isn’t it? From the radical background Obama has, and of course the way his critics talk about him, you’d have expected him to be filling his Cabinet full of Malcolm X’s and Che Gueveras and Nat X’s and whatnot. I guess there is Holder, but that’s about the only case where the choice approaches the stereotype.

All his other choices – the Clinton choice too – would seem to fit the description of ‘kissing up to the Establishment’ to a tee. Why would that be?

One possibility is that he just doesn’t care about these departments – defense, state, whatever – thus sees them as favor slots he can spare as handouts to the Establishment to keep them happy. The Holder choice would the be exception, but that’s because Obama actively needs an ideological and loyal AG on his side. He also brought ‘Chicago machine’ type people like Valerie Jarrett with him to do whatever the hell it is that she does exactly. But the other slots keep going to Boring Suits.

It is for this reason then that choices like Hagel and Kerry, in a weird way, actually distress me. If he would appoint some kind of commie ideologue it would perversely be a kind of relief. But appointing a Boring Suit? ‘What’s Obama planning that he thinks requires him to keep trying to assuage the Establishment with these nonstop stupid boring payola appointments?’, the conspiratorial part of my mind thinks.

Maybe that’s just me.

4 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I literally cannot distinguish between any of the six people in that screencap.

Comment by eddie

Thanks to that pic, I just realized Chuck Hagel is not Dick Lugar. In my defense, the first guy’s name is the German word for a volley or salvo, while the second is a misspelled German pistol. I kept wondering why commentators kept calling Hagel stupid, since Lugar had not previously struck me as stupid. Well, there you have it.

Comment by Callowman

There’s a far less sinister explanation. Obama is an empty suit and the Chicago crowd is running the White House as a Dem. favors machine.

Comment by Dave

I don’t get it. It doesn’t get much more leftist than a literal communist sympathizer. That’s John Kerry.

Comment by RPLong

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 496 other followers

%d bloggers like this: